![]() In the meantime, owners of the Jeeps are left in limbo and have to decide themselves if the SUVs are safe enough to transport their families. Ultimately, though, NHTSA would need a federal court order to impose the recall. Once Chrysler formally rejects the recall, the next step would be for NHTSA to find that the Jeeps are defective and schedule a hearing. Both sides in the Jeep case say they prefer negotiations, but neither is backing down. But that stance carries some substantial financial and public-relations risks.Ĭar companies rarely spar publicly with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the agency that monitors auto safety. Regulators are unfairly holding the vehicles to a new standard for fuel tank strength, Chrysler claims.Ĭhrysler has successfully used that argument in the past to resist a recall. ![]() The Jeeps, it says, met all federal safety standards when they were built, some more than two decades ago. Regulators claim that the position of the gas tank, behind the rear axle, makes the Jeeps more susceptible to a fiery crash than similar models.Ĭhrysler is expected to stick to its contention that the SUVs are as safe as other vehicles on the road from that era. The government says 51 people have suffered fiery deaths in Jeep Grand Cherokees and Libertys that were hit from behind. DETROIT (AP) - In one of the biggest-ever showdowns between an automaker and the government, Chrysler on Tuesday is expected to file papers explaining its refusal to recall 2.7 million older Jeep SUVs that are at risk of catching fire in rear-end collisions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |